A Reality Check for Cohuna Residents: You Have NO Choice on Fluoridation


Cohuna residents are being asked…”

Oh no, no, no. Stop right there! Straight away we have poor journalism. Everyone knows that the entire state of Victoria has a policy of MANDATORY water fluoridation. Community after community has been FORCED, in Victoria, to fluoridate over many years. So let’s just clear up that up immediately. Warrnambool, Mildura, Geelong, etc, etc – the list is long – all fluoridated forcibly. Cohuna, you have no choice – a fact you will soon learn, we’re sorry to say, painfully. Don’t be fooled into thinking democracy is some kind of reality in this fluoridation business.

“A drop-in information session has been organised…”

They did the same thing to us in Mildura, and to countless other towns. They like to quietly slip in, give you their propaganda, then later when they announce you are being forcibly fluoridated and you object, they can say – on grounds of technicality – that you were ‘consulted.’ It’s all bullshit of course, but now we’ve warned you, you know exactly what they are up to. Prepare yourself for it with key information.

“Fluoridation is credited with…”

If you want to know the real facts on this matter, start with this presentation. For more detailed information, click here (then scroll down to the section titled, ‘Tooth Decay’). Still hungry for more? Watch these.

90% of Victorians have access…”

Um, WHY EXACTLY do 90% of Victorians “have access”?? – Oh yeah, that’s right… they were FORCIBLY FLUORIDATED by the same department making this percentage statement!

“On the value of water fluoridation…”

Gee, they are really giving you both sides of the story, aren’t they? Cut through this garbage and read these responses to pro-fluoridation claims. Perhaps you would prefer a video rebuttal? If so, click here. Or maybe you’d simply like to get involved in the movement against fluoridation right now. This website has everything you need to get started. But some people like a good solid book in their hand. If you are one of these people, read The Case Against Fluoride, which includes 80 pages of references to the scientific literature.

Author: AFA Mildura

Administrator, Anti-Fluoridation Association of Mildura

4 thoughts on “A Reality Check for Cohuna Residents: You Have NO Choice on Fluoridation

  1. a posting from Arkansas – dental industry = water fluoridation = follow the money = give me the money !!!

    secure arkansas

    As many of you know, the Arkansas Department of Health had their quarterly meeting on July 23, 2015, and here is the meeting agenda. You’ll see Fluoridation Update under Other Business on page 3 of their agenda. (We will have more updates and news videos to come on this meeting!)

    Click here to the watch video of Jeff Stone, Director Engineering, during the ADH Quarterly Board Meeting on 7/23/2015. (Turn your volume up.)

    At the beginning, he mentions the spreadsheet / chart that was created back when ACT 197 was passed. It mentions 37 systems that they (ADH) needed to follow-up with and give technical assistance to bring them into compliance with the fluoridation requirements.

    He says, “Close to 76% of Arkansans that receive public water receive water that is fluoridated. We’re now slightly above the national average.” Of the 37 systems addressed, 24 are fluoridated. Of the 9 left, 6 should reach compliance within a year and begin fluoridation. He believes that the “progress” has been mainly due to the fact that “the Delta Dental Foundation has been willing to fund any reasonable request for equipment to initiate this process.” He mentions that there might be up to 4 systems where technical assistance on their part (ADH) might not complete the process and they might have to rely on the administrative hearing process in those systems.

    Questions/comments during the meeting:
    Clark Fincher, M.D. and past president of the Arkansas State Board of Health, mentioned that fluoridation was contingent upon grant money from Delta Dental in some districts to be able to afford to do it. Delta Dental’s initial commitment was $500,000… but they have currently funded up to eight or nine MILLION dollars to fluoridate!

    Secure Arkansas doesn’t believe that Delta Dental actually thought $500,000 would be enough to pull off the fluoridation mandate. Looks like a classic bait-and-switch tactic to us!

    Also, at the end of the video, Miranda Childs-Beebe (a dentist and past 2014 president of the Arkansas State Board of Health) asks, “How long are we going to [sic] wait before any kind of… action will be taken against the water systems that we know are not in compliance and not even making any steps to being in compliance?” Her question is referred to Reggie (Reginald Rogers, J.D., Deputy General Counsel for the Arkansas Department of Health).

    Take notice of the smirk on Miranda’s face when this is mentioned. Again, it seems that some of the board members want to bully the water operators into putting this dangerous drug into our water supplies.

    Reginald Rogers says that they’re following Administrative Procedures regarding water systems that aren’t making an effort to be in compliance with the law (ACT 197). He has gone out on a limb with a risky statement like this, and he needs to review:

    Title 42 § 1983 of the U.S. Law:
    Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.


    The question for the local water operators is: Are you going to violate Arkansas Rules and Regulations, or are you going to violate U.S. Laws which trump Arkansas Rules and Regulations? The U.S. Constitution and Laws take precedent over Arkansas Rules and Regulations.

    Back to the ADH board meeting – then Jeff Stone mentioned that an enforcement action which was taken against one system and also that Watson Chapel (near Pine Bluff) has fluoridation equipment in place and inspections should be taking place within the next week to 10 days after the ADH quarterly board meeting.

    Why is Delta Dental so concerned with water fluoridation?? Is it for the children, or could their motive possibly be investments and/or money?

    Remember what happened with SB 359/Act 197 Fluoride Mandate bill from 2012? Most of the legislators that voted for SB359 received a campaign donation from Arkansas Dental PAC for their YEA votes for the fluoride mandate bill. This data was collected from the Arkansas Secretary of State website filings on each individual legislator. You can do your own search here (ie. type in “Arkansas Dental PAC” and the year in the search boxes to bring up pdf files of PAC quarterly reporting forms, but that site isn’t very user-friendly). The initial start-up costs came from Delta Dental of Arkansas. Some legislators received over $4,000 for this ONE VOTE. This can be validated at this website. Click here for the House vote on SB 359, and click here for the Senate vote.

    Big money is involved all the way around! See below for information that could possibly expose Delta Dental and their questionable practices of shuffling money around the country.


    Delta Dental Fund DBA Delta Dental Foundation (Click here to view their 55-page IRS Filing for 2013 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax)

    Assets: $53,614,047 as of 2013/12
    Income: $16,843,297 in year ending 2013/12


    Delta Dental Community Care Foundation (Click here to view their 35-page IRS Filing for 2013 990-PF Return of Private Foundation)

    Assets: $1,157,184 as of 2013/12
    Income: $1,700,000 in year ending 2013/12


    Delta Dental Plans Association (Delta PAC) (Click here to view their 43-page IRS Filing for 2013 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax)

    Assets: $12,162,292 as of 2013/12
    Income: $20,528,448 in year ending 2013/12


    Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation [Click here to view their 25-page IRS Filing for 2013 990 PF (Return of Private Foundation)]

    Assets: $4,823,718 as of 2013/12
    Income: $3,466,991 in year ending 2013/12


    Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas (Click here to view their 51-page IRS Filing for 2013 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax)

    Assets: $116,141,973 as of 2013/12
    Income: $434,011,470 in year ending 2013/12


    Omega Administrators Inc received $919,639 for 2013 for Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas. Omega Administrators provides dental-benefit administrative services to insurance carriers and employers.

    Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation received $3,433,301 for 2013 from Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas.

    Renaissance Holding Company received $7,000,000 for 2013 from Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas.

    Delta Dental Plan of Michigan received $1,261,499 for 2013 from Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas.

    We have what appears to be a money laundering scheme by Delta Dental. Looks like Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas transferred $1.26 Million from Arkansas to Michigan. Is this same process being done by the Delta Dental Plans in other states? This could be to hide the source of the funds!


    Arkansas State Dental Association (Click here to view their 22-page IRS Filing for 2013 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax)

    Assets: $1,428,798 as of 2013/12

    Income: $890,799 in year ending 2013/12

    Arkansas State Dental Association Executive Director, Billy Tarpley, was compensated $159,406 in 2013.

    If these fluoride pushers can dampen our public concerns and silence our outcries by doling out big money for fluoridation to our legislators, government officials in health care, government regulators, and others, then this will help delay any upcoming crippling litigation to all the companies involved in this scheme of fluoridation!

    This isn’t just affecting Arkansas or the United States. Mekorot, Israel’s supplier of drinking water to the public, has been named a defendant in FOUR BILLION DOLLAR NIS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT filed for injuries to Israeli citizens from fluoridated water. Click here to read about the billion dollar class action lawsuit for fluoride damages. (NIS stands for New Israeli Shekel, their currency in Israel.)

    The Supreme Court of Israel ruled that the new regulations will not only bring an end to mandatory fluoridation in Israel in 2014 but will also put an end to any fluoridation – mandatory or voluntary.

    The Israeli Minister of Health wrote: “It must be known to you that fluoridation can cause harm to the health of the chronically ill,” including “people who suffer from thyroid problems”. On April 13, she also had this to say about her decision:

    “My decision to stop fluoridation was because Israel fluoridated all the water for residential use. In fact, less than 2% of the water is used for drinking. Fluoridating the washing-machine water, dish-washer water, baths, toilets and gardening are actions without logic. Physicians told me that fluoridation can harm pregnant women, people who suffer from thyroid problems and the elderly. I was exposed to studies from the world that raise the suspicion that too much fluoride can harm teeth and bones. In the current state we receive fluoride from several sources: drinking water, toothpaste, cooking water, vegetables, and it is impossible to know what’s the dose we absorb. The WHO [World Health Organization] published a study, which shows that there is no difference between cavity levels in countries that fluoridate and do not fluoridate. Because of this, with all considerations and interests combined, I think that continuing massive fluoridation of 100% of the water was not right and many also think that it harms the basic rights and the freedom of choice.”
    [bracketed text, Secure Arkansas’]


    Securing the blessings of liberty,

    Secure Arkansas


    Legal Advice is Not Provided

    The material in our emails/alerts and on our websites is only intended to provide general information and comment to the public. We make an effort to ensure that the information found in our emails/alerts and on our websites is accurate and timely, but we can’t and don’t guarantee that. Nor do we guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information contained on websites to which our websites or emails provide links.

    Information found in our emails/alerts and on our websites should not be taken as legal advice. Legal matters can be complicated. For assistance with a specific legal problem or question, please contact a knowledgeable lawyer for assistance.

  2. Aluminium and fluoride – a health disaster.
    Another warning to the Australian Government about Dementia and ‘water fluoridation chemicals’. This warning also is relevant to the neurotoxic aluminium in vaccines – both these Government ‘activities’ is very serious indeed – Government tells us that we have an unsustainable ‘health system’ due to the heavy demand – and we say stop water fluoridation which is forced on the population and stop ‘forcing’ vaccinations – together this must be stopped by the people. (See hereunder for that information). DDB

    Fluoride’s final frontier?
    This could be the killer argument against fluoridation.
    There’s a new kid on the block, one who is going to force the public sector to start taking notice of what we, the people, want from our medical services. I’ve already mentioned the work that Prof. Chris Exley has been doing on aluminium poisoning, and how it ties in with both the excesses of compulsory water fluoridation and the poisoning of my own community in Cornwall, almost 30 years ago.

    And I’ve warned you that aluminium in our food and water is implicated in the rising tide of dementia, and that fluoride could simply be making it worse. Now he’s challenging the medical establishment, right in the heart of its corrupt soul. He is inviting us all to get involved in a crucial experiment that could solve the dementia problem once and for all.

    He’s found that aluminium in our bodies can be removed, easily, painlessly – and cheaply – by simply drinking couple of glasses of silica-rich mineral a day – water that you can buy off the shelves at your local Supermarket! Now he wants to run a People’s Clinical Trial, to find out if his discovery can lead to a way to eliminating what is almost certainly the most important stimulus in the onset of dementia.
    Of course, nobody in either government or industry will fund such an apparently ridiculous idea – but he’s already shown that it does work, with real Alzheimer’s patients. So that’s where we all come in now – how much would you pay to help to find a way to ensure that your own kids won’t have to face that awful condition of dementia when they are old?

    A preventive treatment to stop dementia is the Holy Grail of medicine, and since fluoridation is utterly incompatible with this vital discovery, all of us who oppose fluoridation now have an additional cause for denouncing this disreputable ‘public health’ practice.

    If Chris’ study gets the funding he needs, it will set a precedent for a revolutionary ‘people-centred’ approach to medical research that could spread far more widely than this. The possibilities are endless, and have the medical sector thoroughly alarmed! So if you’ve been looking for the ultimate argument against fluoridation, take note now – and get involved! This could bring the whole Fluoridation House of Cards tumbling around the ears of the dental charlatans who have assaulted us with their fake ‘medicine’ all these years!
    Doug Cross FRSB,
    UK Councils Against Fluoridation

    Aluminum and the Neurotoxicity of Vaccines
    Read article here: http://wp.me/p460EZ-1Az

    Neuroscientist Makes It Clear Why Aluminum Adjuvants Should Not Be In Vaccines
    January 29, 2015
    After Thiomersal (mercury) in vaccines was linked to a number of human health ailments, it was removed from most vaccines that are administered today, but still remains a problem. It seems we might be on the same path when it comes to aluminum, as it has also been linked to several human health ailments such as; autism, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease  and more (as Dr. Shaw notes).
    Below is a clip of Dr. Chris Shaw, a Neuroscientist and professor at the University of British Columbia explaining the dangers of putting aluminum into vaccines as an adjuvant. Keep that word in mind: adjuvant. 
    As pointed out in the video, a common argument from the “pro-vaccine” side when it comes to vaccines that contain aluminum is that aluminum is present everywhere, that we ingest it more from our food (and other things) than we do from vaccines. This argument is completely invalid, because when it is in the form of an adjuvant within a vaccine,  as Dr. Shaw explains,  the aluminum stays in your body. That’s exactly what it’s designed to do, that’s the purpose of an adjuvant.
    On the other hand, when you accumulate aluminum in your body from food, industrial practices, or any other source, our bodies usually do a good job flushing it out. Again, when it’s in a vaccine the body does not do this, it stays in the body and this is why vaccines that contain aluminum (and other harmful toxins)  should be a cause for concern.
    The clip below is an excerpt from the OneMoreGirl documentary that Dr. Shaw made an appearance in, it’s a film that raises awareness regarding the HPV (Gardasil) vaccine. For more information on that vaccine, you can click here.
    Last month I published an article on the work of  Dr. Stephanie Seneff, a Senior Research Scientist at MIT. She also showed what can happen to a child who receives an aluminum containing vaccine (among many other scientists and researchers). You can read that article here.
    There is a reason why so many families have been compensated from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. It’s a program we don’t really hear of, and one that completely protects pharmaceutical companies (vaccine manufacturers) from any liability whatsoever. Billions of dollars have been paid out to families with vaccine injured children.
    “Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s medical understanding of their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted.”- Dr Chris Shaw (source)
    Video – Dr. Chris Shaw: Aluminium in the Body – One More Girl Excerpts https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FfTo35UrFPA
    “Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues.” (source)
    “Experimental research clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.” (source)
    If you are interested in furthering your research on this topic, there is a wealth of information available from various sources. I hope these ones are a good kick start.
    Related CE Article:
    MIT Scientist Shows What Can Happen To Children Who Receive Aluminum Containing Vaccines
    All sources have been linked within the article.


    As we keep saying with water fluoridation, “FOLLOW THE MONEY/SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!”
    At $54,000, the reported price of the trip that an American dentist took to Zimbabwe is nearly as shocking as the death of Cecil, the widely known and universally beloved lion he killed while he was there.
    It turns out, however, that dentists are quite well paid.
    According to official government statistics, the median dentist in the U.S. in 2012 earned $149,310 per year.
    But that median figure obscures variation around the country, or among dentists with different specialties.
    In some high priced cities, dentists make a lot of money with non-medical, cosmetic procedures from teeth whitening to botox.
    And according to the American Dental Association, the average dental specialist earned $283,900 in 2013….
    Behind the high salaries
    Behind the high wages is a debate over whether Americans ought to be spending so much on dental care.
    Critics of the U.S. dental industry have long complained that dentists are insulated from market forces, resulting in higher prices.
    “They’re afraid of the competition,” said Jay W. Friedman, a dentist and researcher in Los Angeles who has long advocated for dental reform.
    National spending on dental care
    According to the National Association of Dental Plans, an industry group, about 39 percent of the population — 124 million Americans — did not have dental benefits of any kind in 2013, compared to the 13.2 percent of adults who the Obama administration now estimates lack medical insurance. President Obama’s health care law requires dental coverage for children, but not adults.
    “Fifteen years ago, everybody lamented the poor care that the population was getting,” Friedman said. “Fifteen years from now, we’re still going to be saying the same thing.”
    Overall, spending on dental services is increasing in line with spending in the rest of the health care system, according to data economists published Tuesday. The country is projected to spend $119.1 billion overall on dental care each year, up from $97.3 billion eight years ago.

  3. It’s coming and fast….. Corporate Communism that set people against people and white against white in the many destructive operas of the twentieth century .
    When you purchase a TV and park your butt in front you must understand that what you are being informed is controlled media. In other words mostly crap!
    If you are a redneck and only achieve orgasm via your TV then you should get rid of yourself and cease allowing poisons to be mandatory, by governments, shoved into your children.
    I do not give one rat’s ‘arse about you rednecks but, unfortunately, you can reproduce and this is the problem.
    Just like vaccines that you stupids inject into your children you just cannot resist the TV orgasm and shove great amounts of toxins into your children as per fast food…. e.g. Mac’s, and the brain barrier surfer…..”FLUORIDE!”
    You see, fluoride just cannot dumb you rednecks down any lower but your children have your ignorant burden before they reach the age of reason that you, obviously, were denied.
    I think that eugenics has many positive attributes….. Gus

    • Fluoridation is just part of the massive attack by Corporations on the human biology.
      Vaccines inject mercury and aluminum into babies a most potent blood barrier anti-immune heavy metals attack that the human biology could possibly ingest….. we are talking young children who’s brain does not stabilize until around 10 yrs.
      One barrier against vaccine inoculation to young children is healthy mothers milk which has been proven to steady the young child’s immune to this adverse chemical attack on its immune system.
      Doctors are now suggesting that the early child should be fed “bottled milk” to allow the vaccines to work….. can you possibly, PLEASE, understand what is happening here.
      Bottled milk contains FLUORIDE so it’s the old revolving door controlled by these predatory drug corporations AND promoted by YOUR governments and medical practitioners….. YOUR DOCTOR!
      A young child is at the mercy of its parents to protect its survival yet these same parents would argue, and I have fronted many, that our Governments would not allow any substance to be publicly consumed that was harmfulll.
      Absolute crap as YOUR Government invests funds as per Superannuation and Pension for starters into the highly profitable Corporations and their many subsidiaries mostly involved in the oil and chemical conglomerates.
      So!….. you need not a brain much over retarded to realize that YOUR governments have a strong interest in the welfare of the profits of these Corporate chemical giants. YOUR Prime Minister, Abbott, is now advocating mandatory Vaccines just like the mandatory fluoride in Victoria……. do YOU really have a choice in this pretend democracy or have you had enough of this crap and want to speak out?
      Visit…. http://crazzfiles.com for some more of the same…. should you have the guts to look at your self, honestly, in the mirror of life…… Gus

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s