Debate: Connett vs. Kahn

2 Comments

Watch FAN’s Director and environmental chemist, Paul Connett, PhD debate periodontist and former President of the New Jersey Dental Association, Richard Kahn, DDS on the safety, ethics, and effectiveness of fluoridation. The video also features legal expert David Lonsky, Esq, who reviews the legal issues stemming from the practice.

Want to learn more about fluoridation? Read The Case Against Fluoride.

Advertisements

Author: AFA Mildura

Administrator, Anti-Fluoridation Association of Mildura

2 thoughts on “Debate: Connett vs. Kahn

  1. Unfortunately for our population, our Authorities, dentists, doctors and ors. and their interests (it is alleged) are recklessly negligent in their `belief` (and the forcing of it on us all) in water fluoridation/pollution. It is only their political power and media power and also the ‘corporate sponsorships/ partnerships’ etc., at our dental schools at Universities that keeps these highly corrosive toxic, neurotoxic and carcinogenic hazardous waste pollutants hexafluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, thallium, berrylium etc., (also added to that hazardous waste soup is aluminium sulphate) known as `water fluoridation` polluting our water supplies (and hence also contaminating our food chain, us, our pets, all life and our environment).

    Australia wide in dental crisis after widespread fluoridation in every State, first commencing Beaconsfield, Tasmania in 1953 – likewise USA in dental crisis after widespread `fluoridation` first beginning in 1945 Grand Rapids Michigan. There are more dental corporations everywhere than ever before.

    The only answer EVER was to provide access to affordable dental health care services for all the population, not the dumping/disposal of highly corrosive hazardous waste pollutants fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, thallium, beryllium, etc., (known as water fluoridation); into our drinking water supplies and hence also the contamination of our food chain and using the populations` kidneys as hazardous waste disposal/filtration units.

    These neurotoxic (and carcinogenic) hazardous waste pollutants and co-contaminants (from phosphate fertiliser industries and/or aluminium smelting operations) must not be dumped in the ground, air, creeks, rivers or oceans, but dispose of/dump it in the water supplies as a forced ‘medical /dental treatment’ (without informed consent ! ) and according to the pro-fluoridation lobby, it magically becomes safe and effective.

    The People must demand that the Australian Government cease and desist all water fluoridation i.e. the dumping/disposing of highly corrosive toxic, neurotoxic and carcinogenic hazardous waste pollutants and co-contaminants they call ‘water fluoridation’ Australia wide immediately and for all time.

  2. Pingback: Debate: Connett vs. Kahn | dianedraytonbuckland

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s